Friday, May 27, 2011

Callings

I told the First Counselor last night that filling callings in the Church is 10% inspiration and 90% attrition. What I mean is that the process goes like this: Someone suggests a person for a job, and if there are no objections, then I will write the name down. Then I won't do anything until the next week when we meet as a Bishopric again, when I'll ask for objections or the go-ahead. Then I'll let it go another week and ask again. If by the third time the answer is still the same, then I'll extend the call. I guess it gives me plenty of time to be inspired about someone else.

Lehi's Dream

I read 1 Nephi 8 yesterday, which is an account of Lehi's dream. After reading it, I realized that I have always missed or ignored the entire point of the dream, according to the dreamer himself, Lehi. My image of the dream has always focused around the tree, the rod of iron, and the great and spacious building. Lehi's main preoccupation in the dream is Laman and Lemuel. The tree, the rod, the river are all secondary. The account of the dream is bookended by Lehi saying that his dream has made him considerably worried for Laman and Lemuel. We don't even get an interpretation of anything in the dream from Lehi, he just finishes by saying that Laman and Lemuel refused to partake of the fruit. And then he exhorts them with all the feeling of a tender parent. Lehi really sorrowed for his sons' rebelliousness.

On a somewhat related note, I heard a story on The Moth today about religion, and how religion (Christianity in particular) focuses primarily on healing, fixing, renewing, repenting, returning--healing the wounded soul. The narrator used to be a Christian, but became disenchanted, in part because she got tired of seeing everyone who was not Christian as broken or less than whole. It made me think. Do I look at people who aren't LDS in that way--in need of fixing? I don't think so, but I do frequently look at them as missing something. Perhaps it's presumptuous of me.

Monday, May 09, 2011

Corianton, continued

Let me continue sharing some insights I have had about Alma’s lecture to his son Corianton. Through Alma, we learn that Corianton believes it's unfair that a sinner should be consigned to a state of misery. In chapter 42, Alma explains how the justice of God and the punishment of the sinner can be reconciled; here is where I have always gotten hung up. You might expect Alma to say something about how sin makes one unclean and no unclean thing can dwell in the presence of God; therefore, all unclean sinners would be separated from God and, hence, miserable. But he doesn’t; instead, he starts talking about Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden. He reminds Corianton that when the couple was cast out of the Garden, God placed a barrier between them and the tree of life, lest they put forth their hand, eat, and live forever.

Now why was it important that they not live forever? According to Alma, because Adam would have had no space for repentance, and the great plan of salvation would have been frustrated. Instead, it was appointed unto man to die, after having been granted a probationary time (earth life) to repent. Now the thing I’ve never understood is how living forever and being able to repent are mutually exclusive. It seems to me that living forever would have given Adam plenty of time to repent.

Why can’t someone who has attained immortality repent? I have struggled to understand this until the other day, when I read Alma 42:5 again and saw the word “space”. This time it took on a different meaning for me and made it all clear. Previously, I had always interpreted “space” to mean that God lengthened man’s life enough to let him repent; God gave him “space” in the temporal sense. That interpretation may be accurate, but if you define space spatially or geographically, then we read that God gave mankind physical space, away from God, in order to repent. In other words, eating from the tree of life would have made Adam live forever in the presence of God, and for some reason repentance is impossible when you are with God, kind of like how a child eventually needs to eave his parents in order to keep learning. We read in v. 7, “Ye see by this (death) that our first parents were cut off both temporally and spiritually from the presence of the Lord; and thus we see they became subjects to follow after their own will.” This means that repentance is only possible when we have to exercise faith in someone we don't see. Alma then goes on to teach how only through that exercise of faith unto repentance can the mercy of God, brought about through Christ’s atonement, apply to the sinner. Ultimately Alma’s message to Corianton is this: If it weren’t for God’s mercy through the Atonement, yes, it would be unfair to consign sinners to a state of misery. The mercy of God turned on by repentance, however, can overpower justice and bridge the space between man and God.